The disastrous earthquake and the tsunami
According to the plate tectonic theory the Himalayas should
have risen after the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake. However, they sank.
According to my theory (www.nimpal.net)
this outcome was expected.
If the North Pole has moved from Hudson Bay to the present
place, as Charles Hapgood has suggested, the globe's surface rose in two
quarters of the globe and sank in two other ones. The maximum uplift was
almost 12 km at places 61.78°N100°E and 61.78°S80°W. The maximum subsidence,
almost -12 km, was at places 28°S100°E and 28°N80°W
The elevation difference makes magma move toward the adjacent
place of the lowest elevation in every point of the globe. This process
is going on and on, until the globe has achieved a shape close to an ellipsoid.
The high mountain chain Himalayas blocked however the motion of magma, except
trough a narrow pass along the meridian 100°E where the pressure against
Himalayas was the strongest because the distance between the points of the
maximum elevation and the minimum one were the shortest. There the magma
flow broke Himalayas and magma flows trough this narrow pass only.
There the mountain chains have turned along with the magma
flow into direction north-south (look at a map of 100°E between 25°N-35°N).
In the area, south of Himalayas, the motion of magma proceeded uninterruptedly
toward the point 28°S100°E but got only small amount of compensating mass
trough the narrow pass.
The pressure difference between north of Himalayas and south
of it grew higher and higher until a huge amount of magma from a large area
of the Tibetan plateau broke trough this narrow pass, causing the big tsunami.
The pressure on the Level of Compensation of Isostacy below
Himalayas got lower and Himalayas sank not rose as it should be according
to the tectonic theory. This phenomenon has took place many times earlier
and will happen again.